Theory and Practice of China

People's Republic of China pose a threat to the United States could become a power level and the poles of the many possible polar worlds would be the most important claims that have engaged in the academic community for a long time. On the issue this claim is more understandable in terms of making the camp a few important ideas, let's talk. One of them is a more aggressive attitude with every step taken by China's future to threaten the status quo following the rise in the future and the economy began to find expression in a military sense. On the other hand, the West China's progress will become increasingly integrated and that rate is a pacifist who expresses their opinion on the direction of the existing circles. Similarly, none of these options in the Chinese domestic politics, winning is losing power, we see that from time to time groups hailed the reforms of Deng and subsequent economic restructuring and similar circles close to the reformist movement in the camp, largely on the effectiveness of the second idea.

China, however, that the above-mentioned possibilities, and the threat to the U.S. public perception of effort or to create a new rising power of China as the characterization of the basic problems. Already been established and the strength of the PRC and East Asian politics and has already proven to be a regional power that the basic forces are ignored. Therefore, as a result of a sudden glow and glare is reflected as a force to be curious about which path to follow. China is to us a more realistic reading of history in East Asia during the Cold War between the US-USSR and the PRC of a triangle is already an active player in the Soviet 'step by step with the reduction in the power of leadership in the region shows that the step announced. China is a serious military threat against the United States even if the regional is for those hoping to keep in mind there are theoretical points.

One of these proposed land power and sea power while balancing the geopolitical structure of the schools, which would give birth to another of the stability of the neorealist school of two-pole systems. In 1975 the United States withdraw its forces from Thailand and the Philippines 1991'te particular, is very close relations with China and South Korea, Cambodia, Japan-based threats, even as close as possible to keep its relations with China as a result of the perception of the region due to terrestrial possible to say that the superiority in China. On the other hand, the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei are able to use facilities in which naval forces agreements with countries such as the domination of the sea is quite strong. Therefore, more adventurous of the two powers will threaten the dominance in their regions exhibit an attitude that such a move away from providing for their own success in terms of interests-even if it is possible to-date price wars in the land forces of domination is hardly surprising given the owner of the domination of the sea will be high.

On the other hand, Kenneth Waltz’s stability caused by the bipolarity argument that gained the most effective voice in the region not far from the tension of these two fundamental forces, but predicts serious conflict that the two forces would last a life as possible, so far away to confirm this attitude. So recently a Chinese regional power capable of maintaining the same density, the stability of not more than one exam is a serious economic power in East Asia and China, leaning on other continents can see that the effort to increase the effectiveness. U.S. unipolarity as a requirement of this process and to avoid aggressive discourse of regional powers will play a key role to continue the policy of giving freedom of movement.